b'Webwaves Webwavessubmitted a seemingly credible scientificCHECK:paper containing obvious errors to test the peer review processes of selectedDo you know the journal?journals. A series of obviously flawedCan you easily identify and contact the experiments were conducted to showpublisher?that a lichen species was able to inhibitIs the journal clear about the type of the growth of cancer. This paper waspeer review it uses?submitted to 304 journals for review andAre articles indexed in services that you publication. Journals were chosen fromuse?the DOAJ (Directory of Open AccessIs it clear what fees are being charged?Journals) and Bealls list of predatoryDo you recognise the editorial board?journals1, and all had a model of chargingIs the publisher a member of a a publishing fee after the acceptancerecognised industry initiative?Ian James of the paper. The majority of journals accepted the paper, with only 36 of theSUBMIT:ASEG Webmaster 304 submissions receiving comments email@example.com highlighting scientific issues with theIf you can answer yes to most or all of paper. This demonstrates the importancethe questions above, you should be safe Think, check, submit/ of choosing the right journal for yourto submit your article.work. Bohannons complete article isYou will find additional information attend: predatorylinked at the end of this column2. on the ASEG website where there is a webpage on principles of publication publishing andNot only is predatory publishing a riskfor Exploration Geophysics and Preview3. for the author, but a danger to the conferences readership of such articles. One canThe editorial board is easily identified easily find journal-published materialand there is a strict peer review Welcome to the Webwaves columnon theories such as the flat earth theoryprocess to ensure a high standard of in this conference issue of Preview. Inor expanding earth theory. To thecontent. Aspiring authors in Exploration this issue we take a look at predatorylayperson, these publications provide anGeophysics can find instructions for publishing and conferences, and someair of authenticity to research that is aauthors at the following link: https://resources to help identify misleadingdetriment to our field. It allows others towww.tandfonline.com/action/practices. cite articles that the vast majority of ourauthorSubmission?journalCode=profession would immediately discredit.texg20&page=instructionspeersWhat is predatory publishing? When researching, it is important to perform due-diligence using the stepsOnline resourcesPredatory publishing is the processmentioned below to ensure that material of exploiting researchers by toutingis current and has been published in ahttps://thinkchecksubmit.org/publication of material in journals thatreputable, peer-reviewed journal. https://publicationethics.org/ do not use an appropriate peer-review(Committee on Publication Ethics)process nor sufficiently qualified editors.Identifying predatory journalsCommonly, the Open Access model ishttps://doaj.org/ (Directory of Open abused by charging additional or excessThere are numerous resources on theAccess Journals)publishing fees to the author that areinternet that are available to check often not disclosed publicly. the credibility of a publication, someNotesSimilarly, predatory conferences areof which are listed below in the online resources section. Think, Check, Submit1. meetings commonly run by companieshttps://predatoryjournals.com/to generate profit by taking advantage(https://thinkchecksubmit.org/) maintainjournals/ (from Bealls list)of researchers. There is often little or noa checklist to help researchers identify2. an appropriate journal for their research.https://science.sciencemag.org/peer-review. False advertising may beBelow is a shortened version of thiscontent/342/6154/60.fullrun indicating that prominent figures inprocess:3.https://www.aseg.org.au/publications/the discipline will be presenting when, in fact, they have no involvement. principles-publicationWhy is this a problem? THINK:In his 2013 article in Science, WhosAre you submitting your research to a Afraid of Peer Review, John Bohannontrusted journal?discussed what happened when heIs it the right journal for your work?AUGUST 2019 PREVIEW 40'