b'Seismic window Seismic windowWith all this it never ceases to surprise meThe concept of commemorative how robust the method is. beverages must seem strange in these Craig Dempsey days of alcohol free work places.Principal Geologist Im not a fan of off wine or 35 year old BHP Petroleum beer, but the labels are interesting Hi Mick, as they show the huge number of companies involved in the industry Enjoyed your reminiscing about 40 yearslast century. Ithink most of them were ago in the latest Preview. absorbed by Santos, the most recent being Quadrant, a direct descendent Im not after the bottle of red butof Bond Corporation makers of the thought youd be interested in thecommemorative beer.Michael Micenkolist of companies involved in the Associate Editor for Petroleumcommemorative wine and beer thatCraig brings up an interesting point. firstname.lastname@example.org was issued celebrating the liquidsThe seismic method is robust and project in the Cooper Basin and first oilit is remarkable how well it works from Harriet, respectively. despite all the assumptions and approximations. Sure, the end product Nostalgia isnt as goodThe wine bottle is empty (it leaked throughis better if we are more accurate in the the cork and became shitty) but the beerassumptions we use, but it is incredible as it used tobe can still holds the original beer! how a seismic source that can be barely Enjoy! felt when standing 20 m away can Well, its six weeks into isolation andprovide details about the geology 4 working from home and the deadlineCheers km or more below the earths surface. for submitting an article is rapidlyPerhaps this will be discussed in the John Hughes next issue.approaching. Fortunately, I received fan mail. Thats right, after 20 years IGeophysical Operations Adviserhave had two responses from readersNote: Photographs supplied by so that the total letter count since myJohn R Hughes Geophysical Pty Ltd JohnHughesfirst article is now approaching double figures. Neither of these replies were to claim the prize offered in the last issue, which is still available (I could interpret this as the readers dislike of competitions or red wine but it may indicate a lack of readers.) Here are the letters:Hi Mick,Just read your Preview article. So true, but you forgot to mention that although we had lots of TA, secretarial and drafting support, we had to do the complete range of actions involved in the seismic workflow from instrument testing, supervising micro arrays in the field for noise analysis to decide on the geophone array, acquisition QC (both offshore and onshore), static modelling, processing QC (including your own velocity picking) before we finally got to interpretation. These days all I do is decide on the area of interest, sit in on the processing meetings, and interpret the final data before, as you say, make copious PowerPoint displays and presentations.Finally,I agree with your final assessment of FWI (and I would add tomography) along with anisotropic input has changed the game significantly.JuNE 2020 PREVIEW 30'